View Single Post
Old 10-26-2009, 09:57 PM   #23 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,440
car guy... i get where dis is going.

the pre-vtec cam, one would THINK.... would be the perfect <6000rpm cam for low rpm torque and gas mileage

the aft-vtec cam, one would THINK.... would be perfect for a 120hp/l >6000-9500rpm motor

so one could come t the conclusion that honda made the pre-cam to work great at idle-5900rpm and the post-cam to work 5900-9500rpm


no? it would make PERFECT sense for the cams to slightly overlap and have completely different power curves
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote