![]() |
|
| Honda S2000 | S2000 Forums | S2000 Pictures |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| All Other Honda S2000 Related Discussions Share your knowledge, experience and info about Honda S2000 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
More advice on buying S2000...
Hi all,
First time poster. I was reading through some similar topic threads and got some good info. But couldn't find a FAQ thread. I currently own a '91 MR2 turbo. It's a 3rd car that is for sunny day drives and summer lapping days at the track. I picked up this car for a song and then sunk 2 years, blood and sweat getting it to be a pretty good street car that does quite well on the track. It's pretty much OEM+ modding (upgraded suspension, brakes, LSD tranny and some safety gear. Only power mods are upgraded intercooler, downpipe and better turbo from a later year MR2.) But I'm finding that I don't quite like the turbo for track duties. It's a bit harder to modulate the throttle. Also, I'm constently worried about heat issues. Too much torque building up as boost builds. Takes away from the finess. Here's a pic anyway... ![]() ![]() I'm not a power freak. I run 10psi on the street (good for 200whp at the wheels) and wastegate (7psi good for about 170whp) on the track. I much prefer handling over power. But do like the MR layout which allows me to really lean on the rears mid-corner and exiting. I also like the low polar moment of the MR2. Everything is about centralizing the weight on this car. But I've grown tired of working on my car. I've always admired the S2000. But never driven one. I passed up a deal on a 2000 with 20k miles on it from an older co-worker. But I'm thinking that I'd like the model with the 2.2 motor. What was the first year of this? I don't think I like the idea of the CR model. Too....um...ugly. Again, I like a well set up street car I can take to the track. I don't want to own a track car. I like the understated looks as well. So to recap the questions: 1) What was the first year the 2.2 motor was available? 2) What, if any, suspension and brake mods do I need for lapping days? Can I run stock suspension or just shocks swapped out and then hotter brake pads with stock calipers/rotors? 3) What's the typical maintenance intervals? Valve adjustments? 4) Did all models have LSD? Thanks for your time. --Paul Last edited by traffic : 08-07-2008 at 08:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 218
|
I can answer the first question: 2004 (also known as the AP2 vs the AP1 from 2000-2003). I know others will help with the remaining questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
All MOTOR S2K
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 1,030
|
Answers in bold....
Quote:
__________________
![]() Mods: 18" Axis Reverbs w/Black Rays Lugs, Invidia N1 Exhaust, CAI, ACT Stage 2 Clutch, JDM Side Markers, Clear Corners, Slotted/Drilled Rotors, Spoon Pads, Spoon Steel Brake Lines, Spoon Reservoir Socks, Type R Shift Knob, Custom Stitched Hand Made Convertible Top w/ Glass Window, JDM Aero Screen, Body Matching Dash & Shift Molding Panels, Polished Valve Cover and CAI, Engine Steel Braided Wire Kit & S2000 Caliper Vinyls.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
Thank you for your replys.
I did not know the AP2 lowered the redline to 8000rpms. Hm... not that I know what 8k revs feel like (even my old Ducati didn't make much power there...) But the idea sounded fun to spin up to 9k. I may have to test drive both cars then. On the road, I'd want the extra low end punch. But on the track, the lower torque would help me through the corners a bit. So would the gearing still keep me in the meat of the power down the front straights? I've passed S2000 on the track, but I mainly thought it was the driver that wasn't pushing the car to its limits. I've also seen a couple spin coming out of 40mph entry/55mph exit corners. Again, driver error? Or is the rear suspension that touchy? Well, actually, that's pretty funny coming from an MR2 driver which is supposed to be "snap oversteer" car. But spins are always traced back to driver error. Last edited by traffic : 08-07-2008 at 08:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hooterville
Posts: 1,676
|
Just FYI - Suspension changes have been made over the years to reduce the "tailhappyness" of the earlier models. Even so, if you are in the vtec mode (above 6k rpm) you can still break them loose in a corner if you're not careful.
__________________
Don |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
So for lapping days, do I want the toned down suspension or the tail-happy one?
In '93, Toyota went to a "safer" rear suspension. I think the earlier one was actually better for a handling in the hands of a good driver. The later design had a couple band-aids to help the uneducated. I |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
The Car Camera Mount Guy
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 815
|
The "tailhappyness" is losing traction, sort of like drifting, so I think would you want the other one for track days!
__________________
So you're heading to the track and you want to record your sessions. PM me for an in-car camera mount ![]() For everything else, you are on your own! ![]()
Last edited by J'sS2K : 08-07-2008 at 11:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Endless Mountains
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
Loose=Fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
Hm, seems like things are starting to point towards an AP1. Maybe an '02-'03?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
awesome
Join Date: May 2008
Location: arlington
Posts: 637
|
'02 FTW!!! Welcome. I guess you are already experiencing the wealth of knowledge available here.
__________________
i need a better signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
Buying a S2000....
Hello, not sure if Im in the right topic/forum here but I am looking to buy a Honda S2000 here very soon. I live in Chicago and there are many dealerships here with quite a few that I have liked. I really just want to know weather an S2000 would be a good car for me. So far I like them because they are a 2 seater, I would like a hardtop (not sure if they make them) and also I like them because it seems they do rev pretty high in RPM's. If anybody could help me on choosing what options are right for me and really just to figure this out. Thanks
David |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
All MOTOR S2K
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 1,030
|
__________________
![]() Mods: 18" Axis Reverbs w/Black Rays Lugs, Invidia N1 Exhaust, CAI, ACT Stage 2 Clutch, JDM Side Markers, Clear Corners, Slotted/Drilled Rotors, Spoon Pads, Spoon Steel Brake Lines, Spoon Reservoir Socks, Type R Shift Knob, Custom Stitched Hand Made Convertible Top w/ Glass Window, JDM Aero Screen, Body Matching Dash & Shift Molding Panels, Polished Valve Cover and CAI, Engine Steel Braided Wire Kit & S2000 Caliper Vinyls.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
PS the hard top is an option for the S2K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
You know, this is an interesting statement.
When I drove the e46 330i, I would let the back end a bit loose, and then get back on the throttle. Itw ould take a set and then drift (I mean real drift not powerslide) all four tires through the corner. The MR2 can do that. But with it's low polar moment, it's very easy to get the back end to step out a bit too much and it is really hard to catch. How I go fast is to modulate the throttle through the corner to lean on the wider rear tires with more weight in the rear and then also use the weight distribution for a stronger exit. My impression of the S2k is that the handling is closer to that of the MR2 rather than the 330i. The 330i achieves its 50/50 weight distribution with ballast. Like hanging the battery near the rear bumper. With greater polar moment, it's more forgiving and easier to hang the back end out and hold it. It is a lot more difficult to do a (show) drift on the MR2. Once the back end steps out, things happen very quickly and you have to catch it before it gets away from you. In any case, besides the vtec 9000rpm redline, I really like the idea of a Front/Mid engine layout. Quicker transitions and lower polar moment. Plus OEM LSD standard. Here's a video (of me and my MR2 on the track) for grins... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LiA1tAeWiw Last edited by traffic : 08-07-2008 at 03:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
|
And this is my buddy's video. Same track. Same day. He's going a bit slower since he's got a non-turbo. And he's got less track time in the MR2 than I do. But you can see his reaction time is a bit slower and thus...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0FsD...eature=related |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|