Honda S2000 | S2000 Forums | S2000 Pictures

Go Back   S2000 Forums > Technical > All Other Honda S2000 Related Discussions

All Other Honda S2000 Related Discussions Share your knowledge, experience and info about Honda S2000

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2009, 01:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
MaybenewS2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
buying used and reliability?

I guess the best way i could phrase this would be what is it that commonly goes wrong the higher mileage S2000s?

These cars moved up on my list when i found that i could not fit in a C3 vette and i wanna get a perspective on how reliable these cars after the 100k mark.
MaybenewS2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 01:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
L8Apex
Member
 
L8Apex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 79
Have you tried to fit yourself into an S2000? Maybe that ought to be your first concern since it's my view that the S2000 is tighter than the C3.
__________________
old, rude, grumpy track junkie
L8Apex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 02:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
MaybenewS2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Apex View Post
Have you tried to fit yourself into an S2000? Maybe that ought to be your first concern since it's my view that the S2000 is tighter than the C3.
well that is gonna be addressed on wednesday or thursday. I think the honda dealer has one on the lot.

I didnt ask about it because after a quick google search i saw that some large people were driving these cars too. I fit into the C3 once i'm in it, but at 6'4 265-270 its a pain getting in and out.
MaybenewS2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
H20
Senior Member
 
H20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 754
Don't waste your time big fella.
H20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
kgf3076
Raconteur
 
kgf3076's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: I'm here, where are you?
Posts: 1,918
Afraid the seat isn't going to go back far enough for you to avoid hitting either the steering wheel or the dash...
__________________

"
The BS stops when the green flag drops". In memory of David Weber - Malvern Racing


kgf3076 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
MaybenewS2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
well by chance i had a bit of dead time between work and went to go look at the used one at the local dealer...yeah its out. The fitment has an opposite feeling from the C3.

In the vette i would get in uncomfortably and have room after i'm in.

The S2k was easy to sit in, but my right knee rubs on the steering wheel. So i'd be all good if i drove at full throttle everywhere, but that won't work. lol
MaybenewS2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 06:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
L8Apex
Member
 
L8Apex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 79
I've got to ask. I'm in my mid-60s and I've been driving cars on the track from the late 60's until last year. If you are going to buy a car from that era, why a C3? It doesn't accelerate, turn or even come close to braking. In other words, it does not possess quality ratings in any of the three things that a car should do well.

I don't know how the prices compare but a mid-70s BMW Bavaria 3.0 will give you plenty of comfort and knock the socks off of a C3.
__________________
old, rude, grumpy track junkie
L8Apex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 12:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
MaybenewS2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Apex View Post
I've got to ask. I'm in my mid-60s and I've been driving cars on the track from the late 60's until last year. If you are going to buy a car from that era, why a C3? It doesn't accelerate, turn or even come close to braking. In other words, it does not possess quality ratings in any of the three things that a car should do well.

I don't know how the prices compare but a mid-70s BMW Bavaria 3.0 will give you plenty of comfort and knock the socks off of a C3.
Yes in stock form they're not too impressive, but who cares about stock? In stock form most muscle cars from 60s-70s are complete garbage. The 66 mustang w/ 289/3spd combo was a 16 second car with drum brakes.

Its still a good platform. bmw bavarias are not that common and bmws are a pita to work on(my buddy has an e28 and i pulled parts from e30s)
MaybenewS2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 01:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
gomarlins3
"Enjoy the drive"
 
gomarlins3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kuna Idaho
Posts: 4,693
Sorry to hear that an S won't work for you. Good luck with your search.
__________________
Yablownowitz Racing brought to you by Anytime Fitness.

Happiness is a nice road, great weather, and driving the S with Sue in the seat next to me.

"Whatever you do, where ever you go, enjoy the drive."

I know for a FACT that the last year of production of the S2000 is 2003!!!!!
After that, it will be the S2200 under an assumed name.

gomarlins3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
buying, reliability, s2000

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Advertising - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for s2000.com content, comments, or advertising. s2000.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse s2000.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29