![]() |
|
| Honda S2000 | S2000 Forums | S2000 Pictures |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18
|
Rear end
Why is the differential a weak point. Is it the gear or what that makes it weak?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Joisey
Posts: 5,432
|
In-breedin'.
__________________
In life-long pursuit of that most mythic of beasts: the ever-elusive perfect corner. Well . . . that, r' at least a whole lodda clear spin-out room. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
"Enjoy the drive"
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kuna Idaho
Posts: 2,811
|
Because it is designed by another company for cars with less HP. There is flexing that goes on in the housing I believe and this allows the gears to move slightly apart. The torque generated (as little as it is) will cause the ring to slip past the gear and the grinding occurs. This is just my theory, I do not have actual proof in my hands.
__________________
Yablownowitz Racing brought to you by Anytime Fitness. Happiness is a nice road, great weather, and driving the S with Sue in the seat next to me. "Whatever you do, where ever you go, enjoy the drive." I know for a FACT that the last year of production of the S2000 is 2003!!!!! After that, it will be the S2200 under an assumed name. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Posts: 254
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Endless Mountains
Posts: 2,520
|
Jagg's theory,
Many auto manufacturers do not build or design their own rear diff assemblies, yet it's rarely a failure related to application or design. typically, fluid loss due to lack of proper maintainence is the reason for a differential's failure.. Go is correct that the rear is designed for less powerful applications, but they're not really producing any less torque than what stewie has. I believe that the rears are designed with too little backlash for a car with such a sportscar drivetrain. (personally, I"ve never seen a rear end with less backlash built into it than on an S2000) They attempt to elilminate this issue via the dampening design of the driveshaft, and also up front at the clutch (i.e. clutch delay valve)....but for the really hard drivers, it's not enough.There's nowhere for the power to go before the ring and pinion are fully loaded, and wham! she snaps. I understand why they use this weight and size saving design....but most beneficial things under a car have a drawback somewhere. Bottom line, Stewie ain't got enough slop through the drivetrain, and sometimes under harsher circumstances, something's got to give. just my opinion, regards, jagg |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Joisey
Posts: 5,432
|
'Pretty damned "jus' the facts m'am" opinion Jagg.
So, as usual, everybody'z aware'a this brand "X" manufacturer producin' Stewies rear . . except me. So I godda ask: Who makes Stewie's rear n' was it intended for a specific car 'r jus' put on a shelf for universally fittin' whatever came along? Be well all, Java
__________________
In life-long pursuit of that most mythic of beasts: the ever-elusive perfect corner. Well . . . that, r' at least a whole lodda clear spin-out room. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|