![]() |
|
| Honda S2000 | S2000 Forums | S2000 Pictures |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
|
Inine Pro
I have been hearing from alot of people on hear that it is impossible to achieve high horsepower and torque w/ the s2k. I was looking at Inline Pro website and they show a dyno sheet of a turbocharged s2k and it is pumping out 557.67h and 362.93t to the wheels. Just wondering if anybody else has checked this out?here is the website InlinePRO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
|
yeah i knew it long ago..
and also thier is mad nice thing they do is engine build ,they build the whole engine to increase the size,for example. 2.2 build into 2.5 it will adds lot of torque. and i even have the price quote for my 2007 s2000 .. lolz these here is for 550 horse power. The turbo kits is $3995 Greddy E-manage $379 inlinePRO 3mm Turbo Headgasket $295 675cc, 780cc, 880cc, 1000cc Injectors $295 Fuel Rail Adaptor Kit $45 Injector Clip Set $45 inlinePRO Billet Oil Filter Relocation Kit $195 3-Bar Map Sensor with Connector & Billet Adaptor Plate $95 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
"Enjoy the drive"
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kuna Idaho
Posts: 2,440
|
I don't know where on the site it says you can't make a lot of HP and/or TQ with our engine. It can be done with the correct kit and tune. Inline Pro makes a quality kit as well as Love Fab and Ultimate Racing. To get BIG HP, you will need to change the internals as stated above. You can run 7 lbs. on stock internals and 9 lbs with a few modifications. If you are looking for 500+ WHP, you will need some more work done. Remember, the quality of your boost will depend a loton the tune.
__________________
Happiness is a nice road, great weather, and driving the S with Sue in the seat next to me. "Whatever you do, where ever you go, enjoy the drive." I know for a FACT that the last year of production of the S2000 is 2003!!!!! After that, it will be the S2200 under an assumed name. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Questionable Standing
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45
|
I think the consensus is that its hard to increase torque and horsepower on an S2K WITHOUT forced induction; the engine is allready tuned about as far as a naturally aspirated engine can go. Who else makes a non forced induction engine with more than 100 HP per liter? (Ok, plenty of bikes that fit the profile, but we're talking cars.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Joisey
Posts: 5,207
|
As usual, Go's got this covered.
The only thing that I'd add is to remember that everything from the crankshaft back was "efficiently" (read: only carryin' as much meat as need be) manufactured to put the stock 237 HP to the tarmac on a regular basis. Gettin' too HP crazy is goin' to have you spittin' out each piece as it's turn in the "weakest-link" seat comes up. It takes a very restrained gas-pedal foot to put big power through parts that weren't made for it. How do you know if you've got the control to be very restrained? 1) Loss of momentum on launch, 2) really ungood sounds comin' from alongside'a ya, n' 3) shiny, deformed pieces'a what used'ta be drivetrain bouncin' aroun' in your mirrors. If you're visited by those three spirits you'd better kiss a whole lodda your future paychecks good-bye while you're fabricatin' n' replacin' all your drivetrain parts in unobtanium. Be well n' like the ol' knight said . . . Java
__________________
In life-long pursuit of that most mythic of beasts: the ever-elusive perfect corner. Well . . . that, r' at least a whole lodda clear spin-out room. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
3) shiny, deformed pieces'a what used'ta be drivetrain bouncin' aroun' in your mirrors.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ HAHAHAHAHA
__________________
"Drive it like you stole it" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
that's why the inlinepro offer the engine build. they build the engine up to 2.5 liter adds lot of TQ and it will also helps ur engine goes up to all the way more then 500 HP.. have anyone seeing some Lancer Evolution with 700+ HP. i did..it has the 2.0 engine only.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
AMS Engineering built the EVO with 903AWHP...It can all be done, 900+RWHP F22C...depends on your budget, and how often your gonna need to drive the car, for example, 700+WHP on your s2k isnt going to be reliable(as in DD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
So, I guess what I'm saying is that you don't need huge HP figures to be fast. You need to have the right amount of power for your car and your skill level. If a high horsepower number is all you care about, go buy a Supra, drop a few grand into it, and have a 1000hp car that still runs 12's at the track.
__________________
![]() 1966 Ford Mustang 2003 Land Rover Freelander SOLD: 2002 Honda S2000 - Spa Yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
|
that's right but still...
s2k are too damn low HP and Tor...lolz i will like something about 350 hp and 250-300 tor but damn i like the s2k only lolzzzz ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
350 is totally attainable with simply an off-the-shelf turbo kit and a proper tune.
As for making gobs of torque, you're pretty much stuck going with a stroker setup. However, increasing the displacement will lower the safe redline of the engine.
__________________
![]() 1966 Ford Mustang 2003 Land Rover Freelander SOLD: 2002 Honda S2000 - Spa Yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
|
Well my last car was a 03 Cobra which had 770 whp. I bought it brand new and kept working my up the performance ladder. I think I could be capable of handling 500 or so. I am no stranger to rear wheel drive but I do understand were you are coming from though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
|
well, i saw some people running with the inlinepro's stroker kit and they goes up to 10.5 RMP lolzzz
but the only thing i am thinking is the increasing of the displacement effects the balance of the car or not ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Then you are most defenitely looking at a FULLY built engine with lots of tuning. Lots of $$$
__________________
![]() 1966 Ford Mustang 2003 Land Rover Freelander SOLD: 2002 Honda S2000 - Spa Yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Hahaha...let's not get started on that.
Besides, as it turns out, one of the 2J S2k's everyone was super-hyped about was really just a complete hackjob polished up to look professionally built. Apparently, they can't even keep the car running. $16k well spent for sure...
__________________
![]() 1966 Ford Mustang 2003 Land Rover Freelander SOLD: 2002 Honda S2000 - Spa Yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
hahahazzzz i am not the a dmubass buying a car that i like and swap the engine,, i bought s2000 and drive the s2000 because i love it, i love the Vtec ,love the sound of vtec and the driving feeling of the vtec,and there is no point to spend lots of money for a toyota engine honda car lolzzzz ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Haha, I agree completely.
Driving the S2000 is like nothing I have ever driven or raced before. It's really a completely different animal. Sure, the torque figures seem low, but once you learn how to drive it better and better, especially on the race track, you learn how to manipulate the powerband to get you going in a hurry.
__________________
![]() 1966 Ford Mustang 2003 Land Rover Freelander SOLD: 2002 Honda S2000 - Spa Yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Andiamo Veloce
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grittsburg NC
Posts: 480
|
Quote:
What he said. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|