Honda S2000 | S2000 Forums | S2000 Pictures

Go Back   S2000 Forums > Technical > Forced Induction / Nitrous

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2009, 06:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
brewerspence
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 54
400 hp

i was curious what would be the cheapest most reliable way to reach 400+ hp on a supercharger? what brand of supercharger (KW,VT,CT,SOS) i guess would be the answer i am looking for or would turbocharger be easier and cheaper? im not going to skimp on parts but i want the best bang for the buck. BTW it is not my daily driver

Last edited by brewerspence; 09-10-2009 at 06:50 PM.
brewerspence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 06:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
RL1924
Senior Member
 
RL1924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,037
Send a message via AIM to RL1924
I would say any of the superchargers with a tune ems injectors... your talking lot good amount of $$ I know someone locally that just got the new vortech you tune... its 3500 but then you need ems injectors and tune so your looking at 6k without install and im sure there are some more odds and ends you probably need clutch plus install for that.. so 7-8k probably
RL1924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 08:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
s2k16803
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 69
I did just did a turbo build for under $4,500 the trick is to go with a fmu.... you cant get as much power as with an ecu I made only 320whp on 7.5 psi but with that much hp this car still freaking flies.
__________________
2005 S2000 cr conversion
2008 bmw m3 convertible
2007 Jeep SRT8
1991 Mercedes 350sd v12 conversion
2003 Saab 93 aero
2001 Ferrari 575
s2k16803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 09:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
SXY_S2K
Trqless
 
SXY_S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,232
Send a message via AIM to SXY_S2K Send a message via MSN to SXY_S2K
SOS FTW.
__________________
Race time. Got to be serious, not stylish.
www.facebook.com/kesmith3 http://www.carbon8mag.com/
SXY_S2K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 11:48 PM   #5 (permalink)
AeroS2000
Senior Member
 
AeroS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 200
its not made to go to 400 HP.
AeroS2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 10:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
brewerspence
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 54
is the SOS kit up gradable for more power? and also do SC have to POV sound turbo's do?
brewerspence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 09:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
AeroS2000
Senior Member
 
AeroS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 200
i think you should go about 340 HP. SC has a whining sound but gives u alot of low end power. turbo is way better but i rather buy a car that has factory turbo because the engine is built to handle boost. S2K NA engine is not good for turbo.
AeroS2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 07:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
s2000isu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: pa
Posts: 1,770
Send a message via AIM to s2000isu
lol at aero
__________________
S2kx2: "paint it pink! Or better yet buy a Miata"

2001 Vortech SC
12.8 at 111 miles per hour
s2000isu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 08:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
s2k16803
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 69
As much as people say the s2000 engine isn't good for boost I have never gone on this site or s2ki.com and seen a thread saying, blew my engine from too much boost. I run a turbo setup myself at 320whp and honestly if you run a setup with 350whp you will have more hp than you will know what to do with, you will smoke just about anything except for corvettes and anything faster. At 320 I beat a new m3 from a highway pull....
__________________
2005 S2000 cr conversion
2008 bmw m3 convertible
2007 Jeep SRT8
1991 Mercedes 350sd v12 conversion
2003 Saab 93 aero
2001 Ferrari 575
s2k16803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 07:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
brewerspence
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 54
well my buddies are all american muscle so they all have ls1 f-bodies with basically every bolt on some are cammed i just want to be a contender at the drag strip but i mean i already know i will kill them in the twisties
brewerspence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 08:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
J'sS2K
The Car Camera Mount Guy
 
J'sS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,536
i used to own an ls1 f-body, 1997 CAMARO SS, its good for straight line acceleration. i didn't really like it, too bulky. i love the s2000 by the way keep it it around 320hp.
__________________
So you're heading to the track and you want to record your sessions.
PM me for an in-car camera mount. For everything else, you're on your own!
www.getgopod.com
J'sS2K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 08:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
s2kx2
Senior Member
 
s2kx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 624
__________________
"Political Correctness is a pathetically ignorant doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous agenda filled revisionist mainstream media, which holds forth fallacy as fact that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."


s2kx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:07 AM   #13 (permalink)
Skorast'
SPEED!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8
I recently read a magazine maybe a week ago. They test 5 different FI s2000's and with lots of info. The SOS was the 1 that produced the most power both in HP and TQ. It was also rated the best overall for price, reliability etc. 4 sum reason the Vortech was the least popular even though IMO i think it is the MOST popular out of people who ever did put FI into the S2000. The 5 FI kits had a various amount of HP from around 305 all the way to 390 (SOS) but yet the track speed that they listed was not too far apart. I wud go with the the cheapest yet most reliable..Vortech IMO
Skorast' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
s2000isu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: pa
Posts: 1,770
Send a message via AIM to s2000isu
That test was so flawed it wasnt even funny. The sos kit won the test but also ran by far the most boost.
__________________
S2kx2: "paint it pink! Or better yet buy a Miata"

2001 Vortech SC
12.8 at 111 miles per hour
s2000isu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
pakman08
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
sorry for the noob question but what is SOS?????
pakman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:21 PM   #16 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,083
what magazine?
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 05:37 PM   #17 (permalink)
AeroS2000
Senior Member
 
AeroS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by s2k16803 View Post
As much as people say the s2000 engine isn't good for boost I have never gone on this site or s2ki.com and seen a thread saying, blew my engine from too much boost. I run a turbo setup myself at 320whp and honestly if you run a setup with 350whp you will have more hp than you will know what to do with, you will smoke just about anything except for corvettes and anything faster. At 320 I beat a new m3 from a highway pull....
cause when they blew their engine, they're too embarrased to post it. would u post if you blew your engine reving it very high with turbo and miss shifted?
__________________
Once before I saw this car
But only in my mind.
It did not exist
Yet I could feel its power
And now that its real
It races with my soul
Midship Roundabout 2
AeroS2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 05:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Question stuck like chuck!

Personally I'm stuck between getting a supercharger or itb's. I think 320 hp would be sick with the sc but the throttle response and low end gains of the itb's along with that sick roar of an intake sounds like it might be a more plausible setup.
Plus I would like to see how drifting would be with the itb's. Any suggestion?
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 06:08 PM   #19 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Exclamation

Sorry for being off subject a little bit!
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 06:36 PM   #20 (permalink)
RL1924
Senior Member
 
RL1924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,037
Send a message via AIM to RL1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaotic_s2k View Post
Personally I'm stuck between getting a supercharger or itb's. I think 320 hp would be sick with the sc but the throttle response and low end gains of the itb's along with that sick roar of an intake sounds like it might be a more plausible setup.
Plus I would like to see how drifting would be with the itb's. Any suggestion?
Forget ITB's spend as much as a used S/C and get 1/4 of the power and you will be tuning it all the time not worth it most will agree
RL1924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 06:36 PM   #21 (permalink)
RL1924
Senior Member
 
RL1924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,037
Send a message via AIM to RL1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by pakman08 View Post
sorry for the noob question but what is SOS?????
Science of speed
RL1924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 06:47 PM   #22 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by RL1924 View Post
Forget ITB's spend as much as a used S/C and get 1/4 of the power and you will be tuning it all the time not worth it most will agree
I would agree if I was looking for raw power but if you had read my post thoroughly you would see otherwise. But hey, no worries!

Maybe sombody else has some input! Prefferably sombody with itb experience. Thanks in advance for any input!
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 01:33 PM   #23 (permalink)
S2KCRick
The Myth
 
S2KCRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewerspence View Post
is the SOS kit up gradable for more power? and also do SC have to POV sound turbo's do?
The Vortech SC i have has a bypass valve, which makes a wistle sound everytime i shift.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestarbuzz View Post
hrm, i've been thinking about doing this for a while. how's the gas mileage compared to the s2000? i never drive in vtec, so that's not an issue. i like how cute the miata is too, the s2000 is just a little manly for me.
S2KCRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 01:44 PM   #24 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaotic_s2k View Post
I would agree if I was looking for raw power but if you had read my post thoroughly you would see otherwise. But hey, no worries!

Maybe sombody else has some input! Prefferably sombody with itb experience. Thanks in advance for any input!


drifting would be no different than stock

aka, no torque down low.
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:07 PM   #25 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbosix View Post


drifting would be no different than stock

aka, no torque down low.
Now that's the answer i was looking for! Can anybody show some dyno sheets for a vortech sc?
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:11 PM   #26 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaotic_s2k View Post
Now that's the answer i was looking for! Can anybody show some dyno sheets for a vortech sc?
imagine that right there above, but with more peak hp and torque

centri blowers dont make power <5,000rpm

if you want a drift friendly setup you're looking at a smaller turbo setup or a static x motorsports roots blower
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:12 PM   #27 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,083

http://www.kennedysdynotune.com/S2000.htm

  • Vortech Supercharger with Water to Air Powercooler
  • Electromotive TEC3 ECU with Kennedy's custom programming
  • Custom Cams by Kennedy's
  • Forged race piston set
  • Competition valve job
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:16 PM   #28 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Question

Maybe my vision is off. Am I seeing a little bit more low end tq gains with the sc setup you've shown?
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:22 PM   #29 (permalink)
turbosix
S2000.com Sponsor
 
turbosix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 2,083
that one has much more than just the blower kit though, head work, valve job, diff pistons and custom cams.

frmo most that ive seen, it'll have a little more torque ~4000-5000 but not THAT noticeable
__________________
turbosix.net

1984 buick regal t-type . 2003 gpw s2000

Are you lacking coverage for your prescriptions?
Click HERE to print a free discount pharmacy card!
Save 10-60% on most medications at 60,000 pharmacies nationwide at no cost to you.

Last edited by turbosix; 09-16-2009 at 05:24 PM.
turbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:32 PM   #30 (permalink)
RL1924
Senior Member
 
RL1924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,037
Send a message via AIM to RL1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaotic_s2k View Post
I would agree if I was looking for raw power but if you had read my post thoroughly you would see otherwise. But hey, no worries!

Maybe sombody else has some input! Prefferably sombody with itb experience. Thanks in advance for any input!

... I did read your post thoroughly... ITBs will hardly get you any hp gains as T's graph shows $1500 at the low end going to get you 10hp??? Totally worth it
RL1924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:41 PM   #31 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by RL1924 View Post
... I did read your post thoroughly... ITBs will hardly get you any hp gains as T's graph shows $1500 at the low end going to get you 10hp??? Totally worth it
From what I've seen as to how people respond to 10hp gain.......it seems to be worth it. People have said that a 10hp gain is very noticable!
Hey thanks to you and turbo six for all of your input. I have 10 months in Iraq to think about which way I wanna go but I'll keep you guys posted when I make a decision. Since I already have tien's drift suspension I might just stay that way. I'm a big fan of gymkhana but I also like the drivability of a more flexible suspension. So after I decide over itb's or sc we'll see where I go from there!
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:46 PM   #32 (permalink)
Dmaye
Noob
 
Dmaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 494
I gotta chime in here. I know a ton for pple talk crap about the greddy kit but damn gents just look at the TQ curve that can be had for 4k Everything included other then oil and plugs (even thou I would wideband and boost gauge the lil sucker)
__________________
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." - H.L. Mencken


Dmaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 06:03 PM   #33 (permalink)
RL1924
Senior Member
 
RL1924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,037
Send a message via AIM to RL1924
Greddy is really not a bad kit if your fine with around 300hp its just that it dosen't have the chance to go much higher than that where as a lot of other turbos skys the limit lol.

Katoic personally I have met and spoken to someone with ITBs he admitted he noticed almost nothing and even the throttle response was not that much of a difference, Its your $$ though and your car but I would look more into them before purchasing
RL1924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 06:45 PM   #34 (permalink)
J'sS2K
The Car Camera Mount Guy
 
J'sS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,536
I would go for the SC. Man, I would love my car even more if it has 320hp under the hood. I floored it everytime I merge on an interstate. After a while, it doesn't wow me anymore. MORE POWER IS BETTER ON THIS CAR!
__________________
So you're heading to the track and you want to record your sessions.
PM me for an in-car camera mount. For everything else, you're on your own!
www.getgopod.com
J'sS2K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 06:49 PM   #35 (permalink)
Dmaye
Noob
 
Dmaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 494
on S2ki isn't there a dude running the kit getting about 350 out of it. and the real big plus to the kit is full boost at 3500rpms. this kit is a jewel
__________________
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." - H.L. Mencken


Dmaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 07:07 PM   #36 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by J'sS2K View Post
I would go for the SC. Man, I would love my car even more if it has 320hp under the hood. I floored it everytime I merge on an interstate. After a while, it doesn't wow me anymore. MORE POWER IS BETTER ON THIS CAR!
Taking this into consideration......but only consideration being the fact I haven't seen the difference in the power curve between vortech or comptech sc'ers etc. maybe if I could find the differences that would help me decide. However search engines suck.........or maybe I suck at thinking of the right keywords! lol
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 07:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
bresne61
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 32
I have a greddy kit with arp head studs and aem ems, and I tuned in at 357.7 whp on a dyno dynamics dynometer which reads 15-20 percent lower than dynojet machines putting it at 405ish on a dynojet machine. It's running 14 psi on high boost, and 10psi (making 318 on that machine or 370ish on a dynojet)... The car absolutely screams, and with such a small turbo (18g) it spools up nicely. With that much power with a sc you would never get traction...

just my 2 cents..

here's the dyno sheets:
High Boost

Low boost

Engine bay pics
bresne61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 07:12 PM   #38 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Exclamation

Oh and to my understanding centrifugal sc are top shit according to how they work. As for those mentioning anything about turbo charging, that is out of the question. I don't have the money for a big enough turbo to make up for the boost lag.
I've driven many cars with tc'ers and having to biuld boost seems like a waste of time when you can only run certain tc'ers on 15-18 psi, the affordable ones for me that is!
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 07:16 PM   #39 (permalink)
kaotic_s2k
Whippin' Shitties!
 
kaotic_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I currently reside in Wa.
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by bresne61 View Post
I have a greddy kit with arp head studs and aem ems, and I tuned in at 357.7 whp on a dyno dynamics dynometer which reads 15-20 percent lower than dynojet machines putting it at 405ish on a dynojet machine. It's running 14 psi on high boost, and 10psi (making 318 on that machine or 370ish on a dynojet)... The car absolutely screams, and with such a small turbo (18g) it spools up nicely. With that much power with a sc you would never get traction...

just my 2 cents..

here's the dyno sheets:
High Boost

Low boost

Engine bay pics
is that a synchronic bov that I see?
Well as far as never gaining traction........that wouldn't be to bad since gymkhana is about controlling your car with no traction. That might be a plus for me.
__________________
kaotic_s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 07:16 PM   #40 (permalink)
s2000isu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: pa
Posts: 1,770
Send a message via AIM to s2000isu
So this thread is amusing to say the least. Good job beating that highest greddy hp by alot. That turbo is not even close to capable of 405 whp look at the compressor maps they tell the story. I have no idea how anyone could get 350 out of it.
__________________
S2kx2: "paint it pink! Or better yet buy a Miata"

2001 Vortech SC
12.8 at 111 miles per hour

Last edited by s2000isu; 09-16-2009 at 07:22 PM.
s2000isu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
14, 2008, 400, 400hp, aero, dyno, horsepower, hp, itb, na, s2000, saab, sheet, sos, supercharged, supercharger

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 AM.


Advertising - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for s2000.com content, comments, or advertising. s2000.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse s2000.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29